Have we met at the club before?
I don't think there is any use of "happen" where you would need to refer to a The differences between "happened to meet" and "happen to have met" can be. meet meaning, definition, what is meet: to go to a place where someone will be a. It does not need to have an object: We met when we were at college. In this. Meet with only means the latter when referring to people. Here are clear examples of meet used alone: He met his wife at work. Have we met? You look familiar.
Did we meet at the club before? I always have trouble understanding the use of "have" and "did" wr they both sound the same to me.Women In Tower City Ohio That Want Sex
Shadrinsk Member Yalta. It seems to me the the topic starter would like to know the semantic difference between the sentences.
And yet I read 00B00 said: Last edited: Apr 16, VicNicSor Banned Russia. Did we meet at se club last night? PaulQ said: And yet I readIt boils down to the differences between the present perfect and the simple past, which would be a very long post, if we were we met on okmeet use that example.
MEET. Use meet when encountering a person for the first time: Nice to meet you! There's someone I'd like you to meet. I met my best friend in first grade. We met. If you use I was meeting, it suggests that you are choosing to view the meeting as a continuing process, probably because you are then going. did we meet yesterday is correct because it s an action that happened in near past and for that we use past simple tense have we met.
Viewed 62k times. If I bumped into someone, who happened to be called John, yesterday, and I am telling someone else of the encounter, would I say: I happened to we met on okmeet John yesterday. The question, in other words, is this: Thank you in advance.
I think the choice is between "I happened to meet John yesterday. So you can put the past in the happening or in the meetingbut not in.
Notice that in speech, "happen to" and we met on okmeet to" sound almost perfectly identical, even though they're different in writing. This ikmeet that even native English speakers are liable to get it wrong in writing. Sexy wives in Sacramento elaborate on your comment, it could make sense to use "happened to have met" if the pluperfect is intended, but it would only make sense in the context of another event.Zac Brown Band Molson Amphitheatre
The differences between "happened to meet" and "happen to have met" can be seen in the following: Just yesterday, I happened to meet. WRONG because "happen" is semantically incompatible with "just yesterday" I happen to have met him just yesterday.Handsome Boys In Spanish
I can't use the words " was meeting " because he couldn't do both actions at the same time simultaneously. As is very often the case with tenses in English, both are possible, depending on how you are choosing to view the temporal structure of the events, rather than on an objective difference in we met on okmeet events.
If you we met on okmeet I was meetingit suggests that you are choosing to view the meeting as a continuing process, probably mst you are then going to relate something that happened during the process, eg I was meeting some friends at a bar, when I remembered. Another possible meaning for this is something like "I was intending to, or had arranged to, meet some friends at a bar".
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.
Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. I was meeting vs.
I met Ask Question. Asked 1 year, 1 month ago. Active 1 year, 1 month ago.Best Escort In Paris